Lidia Fersuoch remembers as a child growing up in Venice’s San Samuele neighborhood, there were two butchers, several grocery stores, two bakeries, a sewing goods store and even a cobbler.
“Alas, they’re all gone now,” said Fersuoch, director of the Venice branch of the national conservation group Italia Nostra(OurÂ Italy), sighing with nostalgia.
Venice’s resident population has sunk to little more than 59,000, down from about 175,000 at the end of World War Two.
Lagoon die-hards are finding it ever more difficult to live normal lives as the city’s infrastructure and stores are increasingly morphed to cater to tourists instead of residents.
Any attentive visitor who leaves the beaten tourist path and ventures through the meandering alleys that give way to the sublime, seductive but eerily silent tiny squares will ask: Where are all the real Venetians?
“This is not a normal place anymore,” said Fersuoch, a sprightly woman with an easy laugh, looking wistfully out from a flat-bottomed skiff plying the choppy waters of the lagoon.
“Some people have to take a vaporetto (water bus) if they want to buy fresh vegetables but they can buy a $2,000 watch or a $400 carnival mask within meters of their homes,” she said.
Venice’s majestic palaces and churches are built on low-lying islands, mud piles and stilts, and while much time and money has been spent on plans to protect the UNESCO World Heritage Site from water, many residents say the issues that are eroding their way of life have been neglected.
One variation of a joke making the rounds among die-hard Venetians is about a tourist who asks where she can buy a liter of milk for her child and is told:
“Go past the Gucci store, take a right at the Fendi store, go straight over the bridge at the Dolce and Gabbana boutique and I think there is still a grocery store there — if the guy hasn’t died.”
Fersuoch made headlines with an intentional provocation in July when she urged the United Nations to put Venice on its endangered cities list. Mass tourism, environmental neglect and plans for new construction are sounding the death knell for the lagoon city, she says.
“INTELLIGENT” VS. UNBRIDLED TOURISM
As many as 130,000 tourists descend on Venice on some peak days in summer — more than double the resident population.
Calls by groups such as Italia Nostra to limit the number of tourists, for example through reservations for large groups such as those coming off huge cruise ships — what Italians call “intelligent tourism” — have fallen on deaf ears.
“No one denies that tourism is the engine that drives the VenetianÂ economyÂ and that people in the tourism sector work very hard. But by basing so much on tourism, the city has lost its social fabric,” Fersuoch said.
Residents’ associations have expressed alarm about proposals to build a satellite city on the mainland linked to the historic center by a sub-lagoon metro system. They say it would disgorge even more tourists.
Ordinary Venetians have also seen their city become prohibitively expensive, particularly for the elderly.
Getting daily foodstuffs to stores in the car-less city is a strategic enterprise involving trans-boarding goods onto progressively smaller boats and eventually onto handcarts to get to stores that do not have canal frontage. Each layer of transport adds a layer of cost.
Venice has also moved into a somewhat surreal realm of what could be defined as a sort of “absentee gentrification” because many who have bought real estate are rarely there.
Many long-time residents now leave and rent out their apartments as short lets to tourists at much higher prices than they would get renting long-term to students, workers or families.
Those who sell often do so to well-heeled outsiders from as far away as Texas orÂ AustraliaÂ seeking the prestige or personal gratification of owning a second home with a view of the Grand Canal, even if they only use it for weeks, or even days, a year.
“Venice has become a theme park. Sometimes it reminds me of a sad Disneyland,” said Venetian writer Caterina Falomo, curator of “When there were Venetians,” a book of recollections and reflections by Venetians on how daily life in their city has changed over the years.
“No one denies that tourism is necessary, even vital, but the role of politicians is to protect the city in ALL its aspects,” she said. “Their first duty is to defend the daily life of residents, not the whims of tourists.”
“The only way toÂ dealÂ with this is to just say ‘stop’. The flow of tourism has to be controlled. I really don’t think that the economy of Venice will be destroyed.”
Residents groups say successive local governments have missed a string of opportunities to improve the situation.
When the island of San Clemente, abandoned site of a former mental asylum in the lagoon, was developed, it was converted into a five-star luxury resort instead of being put to use for residents as the site for a new university campus, for example.
“With every new luxury hotel, every new bed and breakfast or new holiday apartment, a bit of the city dies,” Falomo said, “As a native Venetian, this hurts me more than I can tell.”
Daily life has become particularly challenging for Venice’s elderly who, unless they are wealthy enough to have their own boat and driver, are forced to walk or compete with hordes of tourists for a spot on the crowded water buses.
And although Venice is synonymous with film because of its annual festival, there are only two cinemas in the city.
“A world-famous city with only two cinemas for people who live there is not normal,” Falomo said.
The Morelli family, which has been running a pharmacy near the Rialto Bridge for 105 years, keeps an electronic “population counter” of residents in its shop window. On a recent September day, the count stood at 59,254.
“I would love to see the number go up,” said Andrea Morelli, grandson of the pharmacy’s founder. “But I don’t see any signs of that happening anytime soon.”