Indonesia's Peaceful Poll Marks Historic Transformation into a Democracy

IN JUST six years, Indonesia - the world’s fourth most populous nation and the largest Muslim country, with 220 million people - has gone from authoritarian rule to the brink of chaos and now to full democracy.

Student-led protests forced the resignation of the country’s former strongman, Suharto, in 1998, after 32 years in power. A period of growing disorder followed, with separatist and religious violence threatening to engulf the country.

Thus it was a remarkable spectacle when, this week, Indonesians across the length and breadth of the huge archipelago of 17,000 islands, strung between the Indian and Pacific Oceans, queued calmly to cast their votes in the country’s first direct election for president.

The high turnout, around 80 per cent, put many longer-established democracies to shame, though the counting was marred by a Florida-style dispute over spoiled ballot papers.

With few substantial policy differences between the candidates, the election has turned more on issues of character - and on showbiz glitz. During the campaign, voters were showered with stickers and T-shirts, songs and dances, platitudes and more songs.

By yesterday, with more than half of votes counted, the front-runner was Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, a karaoke-crooning former army general. With 34 per cent, he was well short of the 50 per cent needed to win the contest outright in the first round, but he looked certain to go through to the September run-off between the two best performers.

His rival in the second round is likely to be the uncharismatic incumbent president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, on 26 per cent. However, Wiranto, another singing former general, was still in with a chance of edging Ms Megawati out of the run-off vote, with 22 per cent.

One of the high points of the campaign was a vocal duel between the two former military men on Indonesia’s version of the Pop Idol television contest. Mr Susilo, it turned out, has the better singing voice.

He also has a cleaner record than Mr Wiranto, who has been indicted on charges of crimes against humanity by a United Nations-backed court, over the repression of East Timor’s ultimately successful campaign for independence from Indonesia.

Mr Susilo was, until this year, Ms Megawati’s security minister and oversaw the arrest and prosecution of the Islamic militants who carried out the 2002 nightclub bombings in Bali. Thus he has been able to offer the same tough law-and-order campaign message as Mr Wiranto, but without being seen as a throwback to the days of authoritarianism.

As for Ms Megawati, she deserves credit for overseeing a restoration of relative calm and economic growth in Indonesia, but she is seen as a poor communicator and a weak administrator who has done little to rein in the country’s rampant corruption. Much of her fading support derives from nostalgia for her father, Indonesia’s founding president, Sukarno.

In April’s parliamentary elections, her Indonesia Democratic Party-Struggle (PDI-P) lost almost a third of its seats, while Mr Susilo’s recently formed Democratic Party surged in popularity. As a symptom of its weakness, Ms Megawati’s government has become increasingly intolerant of criticism.
Editors have been convicted over satirical cartoons and headlines. In June, a US researcher for a respected think tank, the International Crisis Group, was expelled, apparently because the group’s reports on Islamic radicalism and separatist movements had rattled Indonesia’s intelligence chiefs.

Mr Susilo, promising decisive action against corruption and the chaos in Indonesia’s judicial system, has built himself an image of calm, competence and honesty which, pollsters say, has won him support from young and old, rich and poor, and city and country folk.

A fluent English-speaker with a United States management degree, he is also the candidate of business leaders and the financial markets. Moreover, his victory would be seen in the West as good for the war on terrorism.
It is remarkable, given Indonesia’s recent turbulence, that the election has been so fair, peaceful and, above all, conducted in a spirit of moderation. Ms Megawati called on voters to accept the result, even though she might well lose power.

While two Islamic candidates were on the ballot, neither was calling for a fundamentalist Islamic state, and in the event neither attracted much support. The success of this election must put paid to any notion that Islam and democracy are somehow incompatible. M (GM/IM)

     

 


FastCounter by bCentral